A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Anesthesiology Fellowship Program Directors: Attitudes on Parental Leave in Residency and Fellowship Training.

Introduction: Little is known about the impact of parental leave on anesthesiology fellowship directors' perception of their fellows. In addition, use of parental leave during residency can result in "off-cycle" residents applying for a fellowship. This study sought to clarify fellowship directors' attitudes and beliefs on effects of parental leave on fellows and off-cycle fellowship applicants. Methods: An online survey was sent to anesthesiology fellowship program directors through e-mail addresses obtained from websites of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and specialty societies. Descriptive statistical analysis was used. Results: In total, 101 fellowship directors (31% response rate) completed the survey. Forty-one (41%) directors had a fellow who took maternity leave in the past 3 years. Among the programs, 49 (49%) have a written policy about maternity leave and 36 (36%) have a written paternity or partner leave policy. Overall, most fellowship directors believed that becoming a parent had no impact on fellow performance and professionalism; more respondents perceived a greater negative impact on scholarly activities, standardized test scores, and procedural volume for female trainees than male trainees. Some fellowship directors (10/94; 11%) reported they do not allow off-cycle residents in their program. Among programs that allow off-cycle residents, more directors perceived it a disadvantage rather than an advantage. Conclusions: Fellowship directors perceive that anesthesiology residents who finish training outside the typical graduation cycle are at a disadvantage for fellowship training.

American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine contrast shortage position statement.

The medical field has been experiencing numerous drug shortages in recent years. The most recent shortage to impact the field of interventional pain medicine is that of iodinated contrast medium. Pain physicians must adapt to these changes while maintaining quality of care. This position statement offers guidance on adapting to the shortage.

Peripheral Nerve Injections.

Ultrasound techniques and peripheral nerve stimulation have increased the interest in peripheral nerve injections for chronic pain. The knowledge of anatomy and nerve distribution patterns is paramount for optimal use of peripheral nerve blocks in the management of chronic pain conditions. They are an important tool in an interventional pain physician's armamentarium and can be integrated into pain practices effectively to offer patients pain relief.

Minimally-invasive pain management techniques in palliative care.

Pain is a common source of suffering for seriously ill patients. Typical first-line treatments consist of lifestyle modifications and medication therapy, including opioids. However, medical treatments often fail or are associated with limiting systemic toxicities, and more targeted interventional approaches are necessary. Herein, we present options for minimally invasive techniques for the alleviation of pain in palliative patients from a head-to-toe approach, with a focus on emerging therapies and advanced techniques. Head and neck: image-guided interventions targeted to sympathetic ganglia of the head and neck, such as sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) and stellate ganglion, have been shown to be effective for some forms of sympathetically-maintained and visceral pain. Interventions targeting branches of cranial nerves and upper cervical nerves, such as the glossopharyngeal nerve (GPN), are options in treating somatic head and face pain. Abdominal and pelvic: sympathetic blocks, including celiac plexus, inferior hypogastric, and ganglion impar can relieve visceral abdominal and pelvic pain. Spine and somatic pain: fascial plane blocks of the chest and abdominal wall and myofascial trigger point injections can be used for somatic pain indications. Cementoplasties, such as kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty, are used for pain related to bony metastases and compression fractures. Tumor ablative techniques can also be used for lytic lesions of the bone. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS), and cordotomy have also been used successfully in patients requiring advanced options, such as those with significant spinal, ischemic, or visceral pain.

Elements of Pregnancy and Parenthood Policies of Importance to Medical Students and Included in a Sample of Medical Schools' Websites and Student Handbooks.

Background: Medical students who are parents or considering parenthood often want information about school policies. An earlier survey of 194 medical students from one U.S. school examined seven "elements that [students thought] should be included in a school policy on pregnancy/maternity leave." For example, students want to know "how much time a student can take off during medical school and still graduate with their class." We performed multivariate and multivariable analyses of the University of South Dakota survey to understand its generalizability and usefulness. Methods: The earlier survey also included 35 demographic variables about individual students. We tested empirically for associations between the demographics and the seven policy items, thereby evaluating generalizability of the survey results to different demographic groups. We then surveyed public websites of a sample of U.S. medical schools to evaluate usefulness of the knowledge of the seven items. For the 33 surveyed schools, we documented if each of the items was present on publicly available webpages and handbooks. Results: The seven items had content validity as a necessary and sufficient set of items. There also were no significant associations of the items with demographic variables. Therefore, there is little chance that differences among medical schools in their average demographic would affect the items needed for their websites and student handbooks. Among the surveyed medical school websites, 1 of 33 had all seven items (upper 95% confidence limit: 14% of schools nationally would be expected to have all seven items shown). Conclusions: These findings show that it is known what information students want to know about in a school policy on pregnancy and parental leave. Adding these items to public websites is a necessary and an easily actionable intervention to help current and future medical students.

GRIT: Women in Medicine Leadership Conference Participants' Perceptions of Gender Discrimination, Disparity, and Mitigation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess demographic characteristics and perceptions of female physicians in attendance at a medical conference for women with content focused on growth, resilience, inspiration, and tenacity to better understand major barriers women in medicine face and to find solutions to these barriers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Likert survey was administered to female physicians attending the conference (September 20 to 22, 2018). The survey consisted of demographic data and 4 dimensions that are conducive to women's success in academic medicine: equal access, work-life balance, freedom from gender biases, and supportive leadership. RESULTS: All of the 228 female physicians surveyed during the conference completed the surveys. There were 70 participants (31.5%) who were in practice for less than 10 years (early career), 111 (50%) who were in practice for 11 to 20 years (midcareer), and 41 (18.5%) who had more than 20 years of practice (late career). Whereas participants reported positive support from their supervisors (mean, 0.4 [SD 0.9]; P<.001), they did not report support in the dimensions of work-life balance (mean, -0.2 [SD 0.8]; P<.001) and freedom from gender bias (mean, -0.3 [SD 0.9]; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Female physicians were less likely to feel support for work-life balance and did not report freedom from gender bias in comparison to other dimensions of support. Whereas there was no statistically significant difference between career stage, trends noting that late-career physicians felt less support in all dimensions were observed. Future research should explore a more diverse sample population of women physicians.

A cross-sectional survey study of United States residency program directors' perceptions of parental leave and pregnancy among anesthesiology trainees.

PURPOSE: Little is known about program directors' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding parental leave policies in anesthesiology training. This study sought to understand program director perceptions about the effects of pregnancy and parental leave on resident training, skills, and productivity. METHODS: An online 43-question survey was developed to evaluate United States anesthesiology program directors' perceptions of parental leave policies. The survey included questions regarding demographics, anesthesiology program characteristics, parental leave policies, call coverage, and the perceived effects of parental leave on resident performance. Data were collected by Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA). RESULTS: Fifty-six of 145 (39%) anesthesiology program directors completed the survey. Forty-eight of 54 (89%) program directors had a female resident take maternity leave in the past three years. When asked how parental leave affects residents' futures, 24/50 (48%) program directors felt it delayed board certification and 28/50 (56%) thought it affected fellowship opportunities. Program directors were split on their perceived impact of becoming a parent on a trainee's work. Yet, when compared with male trainees, program directors perceived that becoming a parent negatively affected female trainees' timeliness, technical skills, scholarly activities, procedural volume, and standardized test scores and affected training experience of co-residents. Program directors perceived no difference in impact on female trainees' dedication to patients and clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: Program directors perceived that becoming a parent negatively affects the work performance of female but not male trainees. These negative perceptions could impact evaluations and future plans of female residents.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: On ne sait que peu de choses concernant les connaissances, les attitudes et les croyances des directeurs de programme au sujet des politiques relatives aux congés parentaux dans le cadre de la formation en anesthésiologie. Cette étude visait à comprendre les perceptions des directeurs de programme au sujet des effets de la grossesse et du congé parental sur la formation, les compétences et la productivité des résidents. MéTHODE: Un sondage en ligne comportant 43 questions a été élaboré afin d'évaluer les perceptions des directeurs de programme d'anesthésiologie aux États-Unis à l'égard des politiques en matière de congé parental. Le sondage comprenait des questions sur les données démographiques, les caractéristiques du programme d'anesthésiologie, les politiques relatives au congé parental, la couverture des gardes et les effets perçus du congé parental sur la performance des résidents. Les données ont été recueillies par Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA). RéSULTATS: Cinquante-six (39 %) des 145 directeurs de programme d'anesthésiologie ont répondu au sondage. Quarante-huit des 54 (89 %) directeurs de programme ont eu une résidente ayant pris un congé maternité au cours des trois dernières années. Lorsqu'on leur a demandé comment le congé parental affectait l'avenir des résidents, 24/50 (48 %) des directeurs de programme estimaient que cela retardait la certification médicale et 28/50 (56 %) pensaient que cela affectait les possibilités de fellowship. Les directeurs de programme étaient divisés quant à la question de l'impact perçu de devenir parent sur le travail d'un résident. Pourtant, par rapport aux résidents de sexe masculin, les directeurs de programme étaient d'avis que le fait de devenir parent affectait négativement les résidentes en matière de ponctualité, de compétences techniques, d'activités académiques, de volume procédural, de résultats aux tests standardisés et de l'expérience de formation de leurs co-résidents. Les directeurs de programme n'ont perçu aucune différence d'impact sur le dévouement des résidentes à l'égard de leurs patients ou sur leur performance clinique. CONCLUSION: Selon les directeurs de programme, le fait de devenir parent a une incidence négative sur la performance professionnelle des résidentes, mais non des résidents. Ces perceptions négatives pourraient avoir une incidence sur les évaluations et les plans futurs des résidentes.

Pregnancy and Motherhood for Trainees in Anesthesiology: A Survey of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND: Although approximately half of US medical students are now women, anesthesiology training programs have yet to achieve gender parity. Women trainees' experiences and needs, including those related to motherhood, are increasingly timely concerns for the field of anesthesiology. At present, limited data exists on the childbearing experiences of women physicians in anesthesiology training. METHODS: In March of 2018, we surveyed women members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists via email. Questions addressed pregnancy, maternity leave, lactation, and motherhood. We analyzed data from a subset of respondents who were pregnant or had children during training and graduated in the year 2000 or later. RESULTS: A total of 542 respondents who completed training in the year 2000 or after reported 752 pregnancies during anesthesia training. A maternity leave had a median length of 7 weeks and did not change significantly over time. During many pregnancies, women felt their leave was inadequate (59.6%) or felt discouraged from taking more time off (65.7%). Pregnancy and associated leave extended graduation from training in 64.1% of cases. In approximately half of pregnancies (51.3%), women met desired breastfeeding duration, with access to designated lactation space decreasing significantly over time (false-discovery adjusted P = .0004). Trainee mothers often felt discouraged from having children (51.6%) or perceived negative stigma surrounding pregnancy (60.3%). These attitudes did not change over time or in relation to female program leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Women anesthesiology trainees commonly face obstacles when attempting to balance work and motherhood. Recent policy changes have addressed some of the challenges identified in our study. Future studies will need to evaluate how these changes have impacted anesthesiology trainees.

Dissociation between reduced pain and arterial blood pressure following epidural spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain: A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Acute pain and resting arterial blood pressure (BP) are positively correlated in patients with chronic pain. However, it remains unclear whether treatment for chronic pain reduces BP. Therefore, in a retrospective study design, we tested the hypothesis that implantation of an epidural spinal cord stimulator (SCS) device to treat chronic pain would significantly reduce clinic pain ratings and BP and that these reductions would be significantly correlated. METHODS: Pain ratings and BP in medical records were collected before and after surgical implantation of a SCS device at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2008 and 2018 (n = 213). RESULTS: Reductions in pain rating [6.3 ± 2.0 vs. 5.0 ± 1.9 (scale: 0-10), P < 0.001] and BP [mean arterial pressure (MAP) 95 ± 10 vs. 89 ± 10 mmHg, P < 0.001] were statistically significant within 30 days of SCS. Interestingly, BP returned toward baseline within 60 days following SCS implantation. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that sex (P = 0.007), baseline MAP (P < 0.001), and taking hypertension (HTN) medications (P < 0.001) were significant determinants of change in MAP from baseline (Δ MAP) (model R2 = 0.33). After statistical adjustments, Δ MAP was significantly greater among women than among men ( - 7.2 ± 8.5 vs. - 3.9 ± 8.5 mmHg, P = 0.007) and among patients taking HTN medications than among those not taking hypertension medications ( - 10.1 ± 8.7 vs. - 3.9 ± 8.5 mmHg, P < 0.001), despite no group differences in change in pain ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings suggest that SCS for chronic pain independently produces clinically meaningful, albeit transient, reductions in BP and may provide a rationale for studies aimed at reducing HTN medication burden among this patient population.

Annual Number of Spinal Cord Stimulation Procedures Performed in the State of Florida During 2018: Implications for Establishing Neuromodulation Centers of Excellence.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the volume of spinal cord stimulation procedures performed by physicians in the state of Florida in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained information from publicly available state databases for all patients undergoing procedures in 2018 at Florida hospitals, hospital-owned facilities, and independent ambulatory surgery centers. Cases in which a spinal cord stimulation procedure was performed were identified. We estimated for each physician office-based spinal cord stimulation trials (not subject to state reporting) based on the published Florida conversion factor of 25.6% of the total number of such procedures. The medical specialty of the listed performing physician was determined based on the national provider identifier. Counts of neurostimulation procedures performed by physician and within specialties were determined. The numbers of physicians and specialties performing various thresholds between 1 and ≥100 per year were determined, and the percentages of patients whose care was delivered by physicians below each threshold were determined. RESULTS: The data analyzed included 10,762 spinal cord stimulation cases. Among the 606 physicians who performed at least one spinal cord stimulation procedure, only nine performed at least 100 cases in 2018. During 2018, 78.4% of physicians performed, on average, <2 spinal cord stimulation procedures per month; there were 29.4% of spinal cord stimulation patients cared for by such physicians. Physicians performing less than four cases per month provided care for 56.9% of all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Few physicians performing spinal cord stimulation procedures in the state of Florida in 2018 would have been considered as "high volume." Although volume is only one among many criteria used to designate centers of excellence for other procedures, the potential impact on physician practice and patient access to care should be considered if a specific minimum number of annual cases by physician is to be established.

Hospitals' Web Site Lists of Their Interventional Pain Procedures Inadequately Reflect the Diversity of Their Actual Pain Medicine Practices.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary chronic pain management includes many types of interventional pain procedures. However, navigating the landscape of providers offering such services is challenging. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether stakeholders (e.g., patients, referring physicians, hospital administrators, nurses working for insurance companies, and state officials) could accurately judge the diversity of interventional services actually provided based on information gathered from hospital Web sites. STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational cohort study. SETTING: All 119 nonfederal hospitals in Iowa were included in the study. METHODS: We recorded the publicly available data presented on all hospital Web pages related to interventional pain procedures. We counted the listed types of procedures and numbers of pain medicine physicians portrayed. We compared those results with actual performed interventional pain procedures calculated using contemporaneous data from the Iowa Hospital Association. The diversity of types of procedures performed was quantified using the inverse of the Herfindahl index. RESULTS: No pain medicine physician was identified on the Web site for 87.4% of hospitals. Such hospitals accounted for 61.4% of the interventional pain procedures performed statewide. The partial Kendall correlation between the count of types of procedures listed on Web sites and the number of pain medicine physicians, controlling for the performed procedures during the year, was too small to be informative: 0.22 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.07 to 0.38; P = .005). The one-sided upper confidence limit that included 0.50 (i.e., moderate) was the 99.98% limit. The partial correlation between the count of types of procedures listed on Web sites and the actual diversity of types of procedures performed, controlling for the performed procedures during the year, was not statistically significant: 0.12 (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.28; P = .12). The partial Kendall correlation between the number of pain medicine physicians listed on the Web sites and the diversity of types of procedures performed was not significant: 0.03 (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.19; P = .73). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited to the state of Iowa, where we found that 38.6% of interventional pain procedures were performed at hospitals with at least one pain medicine physician. The 38.6% is substantively less than the corresponding estimate of 54.2% for the state of Florida. The estimate of 38.6% exceeds the estimate of 30.4% for critical access hospitals in the United States nationwide. Although the heterogeneity is as expected, it shows that findings are likely to be heterogeneous across regions. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholders could not have accurate awareness of the spectrum of services provided by multidisciplinary pain medicine clinics and physicians based on currently reported data, even if they sought it out from publicly available information. Transparency will need to come from pain medicine physicians, at facilities providing the full diversity of services, releasing quantitative data about the services that they provide (e.g., counts by procedure).

Appropriate operating room time allocations and half-day block time for low caseload proceduralists, including anesthesiologist pain medicine physicians in the State of Florida.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We analyzed University of Iowa operating room data to estimate whether it would be economically rational to allocate, every two weeks, an operating room to anesthesiology pain medicine physicians or a half-day session to individual proceduralists. We investigated the generalizability of the results by studying anesthesiologist pain medicine physicians working at all hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers in the State of Florida. DESIGN: Observational, cohort study of spinal neuromodulation procedures. MEASUREMENTS: Hours of daily operating room time and cases by anesthesiologist pain medicine physicians at the University of Iowa, and in Florida in 2018. For each two-week period, we calculated the difference in hours between (1) the under-utilized time from allocating 8 h and (2) time-and-a-half times the over-utilized time from no allocated time. MAIN RESULTS: The mean greater cost from allocating 8 h vs 0 h equaled 3.89 h, significantly >0 (P = 0.0001, N = 77 periods). Sample mean activities were 0.79 cases and 1.64 h, <2.00 cases and 4.00 h, respectively (both P < 0.0001). Thus, no allocated time or block time should be planned. At least 76.6% (95% lower confidence limit) of Florida surgical facilities performing ≥1 neuromodulation procedures averaged <1.08 cases per two weeks. At least 89.6% of the facilities averaged <2 cases per two weeks. At least 88.8% of combinations of anesthesiologist and facility in Florida averaged fewer cases per two weeks than anesthesiologist proceduralists at the University of Iowa. At least 96.5% of the proceduralists averaged <2 cases per two weeks at each facility where they operated. CONCLUSIONS: Among anesthesiologist proceduralists in Florida using operating room time for neurostimulator procedures, most perform too few cases weekly for the economically appropriate planning of block time. Few Florida facilities would have enough cases, even potentially, to warrant allocating operating room time.

Reliability and Validity of Performance Evaluations of Pain Medicine Clinical Faculty by Residents and Fellows Using a Supervision Scale.

BACKGROUND: Annual and/or semiannual evaluations of pain medicine clinical faculty are mandatory for multiple organizations in the United States. We evaluated the validity and psychometric reliability of a modified version of de Oliveira Filho et al clinical supervision scale for this purpose. METHODS: Six years of weekly evaluations of pain medicine clinical faculty by resident physicians and pain medicine fellows were studied. A 1-4 rating (4 = "Always") was assigned to each of 9 items (eg, "The faculty discussed with me the management of patients before starting a procedure or new therapy and accepted my suggestions, when appropriate"). RESULTS: Cronbach α of the 9 items equaled .975 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.974-0.976). A G coefficient of 0.90 would be expected with 18 raters; the N = 12 six-month periods had mean 18.8 ± 5.9 (standard deviation [SD]) unique raters in each period (median = 20).Concurrent validity was shown by Kendall τb = 0.45 (P < .0001) pairwise by combination of ratee and rater between the average supervision score and the average score on a 21-item evaluation completed by fellows in pain medicine. Concurrent validity also was shown by τb = 0.36 (P = .0002) pairwise by combination of ratee and rater between the average pain medicine supervision score and the average operating room supervision score completed by anesthesiology residents.Average supervision scores differed markedly among the 113 raters (η = 0.485; CI, 0.447-0.490). Pairings of ratee and rater were nonrandom (Cramér V = 0.349; CI, 0.252-0.446).Mixed effects logistic regression was performed with rater leniency as covariates and the dependent variable being an average score equaling the maximum 4 vs <4. There were 3 of 13 ratees with significantly more averages <4 than the other ratees, based on P < .01 criterion; that is, their supervision was reliably rated as below average. There were 3 of 13 different ratees who provided supervision reliably rated as above average.Raters did not report higher supervision scores when they had the opportunity to perform more interventional pain procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluations of pain medicine clinical faculty are required. As found when used for evaluating operating room anesthesiologists, a supervision scale has excellent internal consistency, achievable reliability using 1-year periods of data, concurrent validity with other ratings, and the ability to differentiate among ratees. However, to be reliable, routinely collected supervision scores must be adjusted for rater leniency.

Pain Medicine Board Certification Status Among Physicians Performing Interventional Pain Procedures in the State of Florida Between 2010 and 2016.

BACKGROUND: The US Department of Health and Human Services has recommended that physicians performing interventional pain procedures be credentialed based on criteria based guidelines and minimum training requirements. OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively assess gaps in certification related to pain medicine fellowship requirements, we studied the distribution of such procedures in Florida between 2010 and 2016. STUDY DESIGN: This research involved a retrospective analysis with a sample size of n = 1,885,442 interventional pain procedures. SETTING: Data describing interventional pain procedures performed in Florida between January 2010 and December 2016 were obtained from the Florida Department of Health. The National Provider Identifier file and board certification lists from the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), the American Board of Pain Medicine (ABPM), and the American Board of Interventional Pain Physicians (ABIPP) corresponding to this time frame were also obtained. METHODS: The datasets were linked to determine the specialty of physicians performing interventional pain procedures, and whether or not they were pain medicine diplomates of the ABMS, the ABPM, or the ABIPP. The similarity index theta was calculated for the distribution of interventional pain procedure codes among medical specialty groups, and with respect to the practitioners' pain medicine board certification status. RESULTS: Of the interventional pain procedures, anesthesiologists performed 63.5%, physiatrists 19.1%, neurologists or psychiatrists 5.2%, and other practitioners 12.3%. Among procedures performed by anesthesiologists, physiatrists, and psychiatrists or neurologists, 66.2%, 50.3%, and 50.4% were by ABMS pain board-certified practitioners, respectively. Practitioners without ABMS pain medicine boards performed 45.8% of interventional pain procedures. Practitioners without such boards from either the ABMS, ABPM, or ABIPP performed 37.7%. There was very large similarity (theta > 0.9) in the distribution of procedures comparing ABMS pain medicine board-certified practitioners to non-ABMS pain medicine board-certified anesthesiologists, physiatrists, or all other specialties. LIMITATIONS: In countries other than the United States, where pain medicine board certification is relatively recent, there may be a higher percentage of interventional pain procedures performed by individuals without certification than we report. In "opt-out" states, where nurse anesthetists can independently perform interventional pain procedures, the percentage of interventional pain procedures performed by individuals without physician pain medicine board certification may also be higher. The datasets we used do not contain information to allow assessment of outcomes or effectiveness resulting from pain medicine board certification. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of interventional pain procedures were performed by physicians without at least 1 of the 3 pain medicine board certifications. In addition, the practitioners performed very similar distributions of procedures (i.e., those without pain medicine board certification, overall, have not restricted their practice). These results suggest the need for additional accredited pain medicine fellowship training positions for newly graduated residents. The results also show that, for the recommendations of the Department of Health and Human Services to be satisfied, physicians without board certification performing intervention procedures would need to obtain ABPM or ABIPP certification, or ABMS certification after completion of a full-time Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education pain medicine fellowship. KEY WORDS: Chronic pain, education, medical, graduate, specialty boards.